AtWhatMileage
Lighting · 28 owner reports

Tail light, brake light or signal failure on the 2002 Chevrolet Impala

Reports of this failure 28
With an odometer reading 23
Reports per 1,000 built 0.3 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 9%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 0
Typical repair $100–$900
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 7th

When tail light, brake light or signal failure gets reported

Owners of the 2002 Chevrolet Impala report tail light, brake light or signal failure at a median of 85,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 55,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles, from 23 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 85,000 miles. It is the 7th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 40,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 120,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 81,064 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

When the reports scatter this far, the mileage is telling you about how these cars were driven more than about the part itself.

9% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 23 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
39,936 miles 56,200 miles 85,000 miles 100,000 miles 121,000 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Putting it right typically runs $100–$900 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 12 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2011, at a median of 50,000 miles, and latest on the 2009 at 155,000 miles.

By volume the 2001 carries the most reports, with 48; the 2002 has 28. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

The consumer states the turn signals fail intermittently. The cause has yet to be determined. Please provide additional information.. *nm the consumer stated that the signals operate through the hazard warning switch. *tc

30,000 miles NHTSA complaint 516780 filed 2005-01-13

Turn signals failed to function occasionally and this problem was increasing in frequency. No accidents,but I had to roll down window to give turn indications. My chevy dealer replaced a part or parts and I seem to be ok. At a cost of over 100 dollars. *nm

75,000 miles NHTSA complaint 557854 filed 2005-10-09

Tl* - the contact has a 2002 chevrolet impala. The contact stated that when closing the hood it pressed the rubber above the headlights into the top of the headlights, and caused water to leak into the headlights. There was always water in the headlights which caused the headlights to be dim and not to perform at highest potential. Also, the contact stated that the paint was coming off of the turn signal due to the water. The headlights were becoming dimmer and dimmer. *ak update 4/9 *tr

39,936 miles NHTSA complaint 609220 filed 2007-01-10

Also reported on the 2002 Chevrolet Impala

Other electrical problem

119 reports median 95k

Other engine problem

78 reports median 129k

Other lighting problem

59 reports median 85k

Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure

54 reports median 68k

Headlight failure or clouding

53 reports median 60k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 28 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does tail light, brake light or signal failure happen on the 2002 Chevrolet Impala?

Across 23 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 85,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 55,000 miles and a quarter after 100,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is tail light, brake light or signal failure on the 2002 Chevrolet Impala?

28 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.3 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed