2006 Cadillac Cts: what breaks, and at what mileage

What owners report breaking

Owners have reported 45 named failure modes on the 2006 Cadillac Cts, and the three most-reported carry 25% of everything filed, which is an unusually even spread for one model year.

Other brake problem leads with 35 reports, about 0.9 per 1,000 vehicles and with the middle half of reports between 35k to 100,000 miles.

Differential or transfer case failure follows with 32 reports, usually reported between 8k to 35,000 miles.

Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure follows with 26 reports, usually reported between 57k to 85,000 miles.

By system, the reports fall mostly into electrical (57), brakes (55) and engine (40).

What happens when these parts fail

Across the named modes, 28 mention a crash, 3 a fire, 11 an injury and 3 a fatality. Those are the words owners used in their own complaints, and NHTSA does not verify them, but they are the closest thing in this data to a measure of what a failure actually did.

The average severity weight across every report on this year is 4.54, where a stalled engine or a failed airbag weighs many times more than a rattling trim panel, and a figure this high means the reports are dominated by failures with safety consequences rather than annoyances. The weighting is set out in full on the methodology page.

What the top failures cost to put right, as editorial estimates for an independent US shop rather than figures from NHTSA: other brake problem at $300–$1,800, differential or transfer case failure at $900–$4,200, control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure at $700–$3,000 and other electrical problem at $250–$2,000. Dealer labour, a seized bolt or a part that is no longer made can push any of these past the top of its range.

28% of the reports on this year sit in the engine, transmission, drivetrain or cooling systems — the four where a repair bill is usually four figures.

How often, against how many were built

Scaled by an estimate of how many of these cars exist, the 2006 Cadillac Cts draws about 10 per 1,000 vehicles, which puts it in the 88th percentile of complaint rates among 2006 vehicles we can rate.

That denominator is the weakest number on the page and it is fair to say so plainly. Rate per 1,000 uses a fleet-size estimate derived from recall paperwork for this exact model year. It is a lower bound.

The working figure is 36,955 vehicles. If the true number is twice that, every rate on this page is half what it says; the ranking against other 2006 vehicles, which is what the risk score uses, is far more robust than the rate itself.

Recalls on the 2006 model year

NHTSA has issued 6 recall campaigns covering the 2006 Cadillac Cts, affecting an estimated 125,782 vehicles. A recall is a different kind of evidence from a complaint: it is the regulator and the manufacturer agreeing that something has to be fixed, and the fix is free for as long as the car exists.

The campaigns cover fuel system, gasoline:delivery:fuel pump, electrical system:ignition, air bags:frontal:sensor/control module-inactive and service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:hoses, lines. Whether the work was actually done on the car in front of you is a question only the VIN can answer, and the manufacturer or NHTSA will answer it free.

Recalls also distort complaint counts. Publicity about a campaign reminds owners that complaining is possible, so reports for a recalled component often spike after the recall rather than before it.

How 2006 compares with the other years

High risk for a 2006 — 93rd riskiest of the 343 2006 vehicles we can rate. Because the ranking is against the same model year only, age cancels out of it.

Across the 16 model years of this car that carry enough reports to score, 2019 comes out best at 58 and 2009 worst at 76, with 2006 itself at 72.

If the model year is negotiable, 2019, 2010 and 2003 score lower than 2006 by a margin worth acting on. Same body, same engines, different luck — usually a supplier change or a mid-cycle fix, which the complaint data can show but never explain.

Within the 2003–2009 generation specifically, 2003 is the strongest year at 69 and 2009 the weakest at 76.

Where to spend the inspection money

The mileages below are where the first quarter of reports for each mode had already been filed, which makes them the point at which a fault is worth looking for rather than the point at which it happens: differential or transfer case failure from about 8k, airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault from about 20k, other powertrain problem from about 30k and other brake problem from about 35k.

On a 2006 Cadillac Cts with more miles than that on it, the useful question to put to a seller or a mechanic is whether differential or transfer case failure has been dealt with, and if so with what parts and at whose expense. A car that has already had the repair is in a different position from one that has not.

None of this is a diagnosis. It is a list of what other owners of the same model year reported, ordered by when they reported it, which is a good place to point an inspection and a poor place to stop.

What this page cannot tell you

371 owner reports; fleet size estimated from this year's own recall paperwork. Every count on this page is therefore a floor: it is the number of owners who went to the trouble of filing with a federal agency, which is a small and self-selected fraction of the owners who had the fault.

Of those 371 reports, 305 carried an odometer reading, so the mileages here describe 82% of the sample rather than all of it. Owners also round: readings pile up on multiples of ten thousand, which is why this site publishes "about 90,000 miles" and not "91,438".

Named failure modes come from matching phrases in the complaint text, so a badly worded complaint can land in the wrong bucket. The effect washes out across hundreds of reports and does not wash out across five.

And nothing here predicts what one car will do. These are other people's complaints, filed years apart, on cars maintained by strangers. Read the page as a map of where this model year has previously gone wrong, then have the specific car in front of you inspected.