AtWhatMileage
Brakes · 15 owner reports

Other brake problem on the 2003 Toyota Tundra

2 crashes 2 of the 15 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 15
With an odometer reading 11
Reports per 1,000 built 0.2 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 36%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 2
Typical repair $300–$1,800
What it means when it happens High
Rank among this year's problems 8th

When other brake problem gets reported

Owners of the 2003 Toyota Tundra report other brake problem at a median of 40,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 30,000 miles and a quarter after 75,000 miles, from 11 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 88,000 miles. It is the 8th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 20,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 80,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 61,640 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

36% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 11 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
17,500 miles 31,766 miles 40,000 miles 77,000 miles 79,140 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 2 a crash is mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $300–$1,800 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 25 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2022, at a median of 100 miles, and latest on the 2006 at 85,000 miles.

By volume the 2000 carries the most reports, with 177; the 2003 has 15. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Dt: the consumer complained about a brake problem. At first the front brakes caused the vehicle to shutter when they were applied. Then the brakes faded out, causing the vehicle to not stop in time. The consumer felt that the weight of the vehicle was too much for the brakes. The consumer found that the problem was due to the brakes wearing out too quickly. The front brakes have been replaced once under warranty. Also,the rotors and pads were replaced. The problem first started in june 2004 and at 15,000-20,000 miles. The problem almost caused several accidents. The manufacturer issued five technical service bulletins (tsb) for the front brakes. They had a brake upgrade available for the vehicle. They refused to fix the vehicle under warranty. *ak (11/15/05) *sc

17,500 miles NHTSA complaint 556864 filed 2005-10-03

I have a 2003 tundra and the brakes vibrate when applied. This is a safety issue especially in snow slush and rain. I refuse to pay $2,000 for a manufacturing defect. I also see it affects many other owners. Hopefully I don't get hurt! *jb

30,000 miles NHTSA complaint 608397 filed 2007-01-03

Have a toyota tundra with front brakes that are warped. Vehicle has extreme vibration when braking. Apparently toyota has a tsb issued for this but the vehicle is now out of warranty. This seems to be a common problem from what I have read. *tr

74,000 miles NHTSA complaint 706001 filed 2009-01-28

Also reported on the 2003 Toyota Tundra

Other body or interior problem

69 reports median 113k

Rust or structural corrosion

61 reports median 101k

Differential or transfer case failure

35 reports median 108k

Fuel tank, filler or EVAP failure

33 reports median 111k

Airbag inflator rupture

21 reports median 156k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 15 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other brake problem happen on the 2003 Toyota Tundra?

Across 11 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 40,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 30,000 miles and a quarter after 75,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other brake problem on the 2003 Toyota Tundra?

15 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed