AtWhatMileage
Adas · 58 owner reports

Other speed control problem on the 2006 Toyota Corolla

30 crashes 11 injuries 41 of the 58 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 58
With an odometer reading 51
Reports per 1,000 built 0.4 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 37%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 41
Typical repair $250–$2,000
What it means when it happens Critical
Rank among this year's problems 3rd

When other speed control problem gets reported

Owners of the 2006 Toyota Corolla report other speed control problem at a median of 47,500 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 12,500 miles and a quarter after 82,500 miles, from 51 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 78,000 miles. It is the 3rd most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 5,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 115,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 108,001 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.

37% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 51 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
5,999 miles 12,601 miles 47,000 miles 82,840 miles 114,000 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 30 a crash and 11 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $250–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 23 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2010, at a median of 6,000 miles, and latest on the 2000 at 130,000 miles.

By volume the 2009 carries the most reports, with 163; the 2006 has 58. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1996 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 73k
  2. 1997 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 40k
  3. 1998 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 62k
  4. 1999 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 55k
  5. 2000 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 132k
  6. 2001 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 60k
  7. 2002 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 91k
  8. 2003 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 75k
  9. 2004 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 43k
  10. 2005 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 40k
  11. 2006 (this one) 47k
  12. 2007 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 33k
  13. 2008 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 29k
  14. 2009 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 20k
  15. 2010 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 6k
  16. 2011 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 10k
  17. 2012 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 12k
  18. 2013 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 39k
  19. 2014 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 16k
  20. 2015 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 11k
  21. 2016 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 8k
  22. 2017 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 9k
  23. 2019 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem 9k
  24. 2020 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  25. 2021 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  26. 2022 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  27. 2024 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —
  28. 2026 Toyota Corolla other speed control problem
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

What owners wrote

Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.

Dt: the contact stated while coming to a stop in a parking lot the engine revved the vehicle lunged forward. When the vehicle lunched forward it rolled over the concrete slab used at the end of parking spaces and crashed into a tree. The vehicle was towed to dealer. The front bumper and the driver side mirrors were replaced and the dents in the vehicle were fixed however the dealer was unable to determine the cause of the vehicle lurching forward. A police report was filed on the scene.

5,999 miles NHTSA complaint 589309 filed 2006-07-21

My wife was behind the wheel of her 2006 toyota corolla le and was backing slowly out of a parking space (her foot was resting on the brake pedal) when she and another driver bumped rear bumpers (speed was about 2 MPH), my wife shifted the transmission into drive, the engine raced the car leaded forward up and over a cement parking curb and into a plate glass window of a health spa (ymca). It was a miracle that no one in the spa was seriously hurt . The car was totaled ,my wife was devastated and emotionally a wreck. The car was inspected for mechanical defects by a state inspector. None were found. *nm

11,201 miles NHTSA complaint 592272 filed 2006-08-12

On may 28, 2006, while attempting to make a routine stop in a commercial lot, the engine of the car revved, the car accelerated and jumped the concrete stop at the end of the parking space and crashed into a tree causing extensive damage along the driver's side of the car. The car was towed to the dealership who made the repairs. The dealership from whom I bought the car indicated verbally that nothing was wrong with the engine. I am certain that human error did not play a part in the car's sudden acceleration. *jb

6,500 miles NHTSA complaint 593923 filed 2006-08-25

Also reported on the 2006 Toyota Corolla

Airbag inflator rupture

159 reports median 120k

Control module (ECM/PCM/BCM) failure

87 reports median 55k

Other engine problem

57 reports median 54k

Other electrical problem

35 reports median 40k

Airbag failed to deploy in a crash

24 reports median 79k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 58 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does other speed control problem happen on the 2006 Toyota Corolla?

Across 51 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 47,500 miles. A quarter were filed before 12,500 miles and a quarter after 82,500 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is other speed control problem on the 2006 Toyota Corolla?

58 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.4 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed