Other fuel system problem on the 2011 Nissan Leaf
1 crash 1 injury 2 of the 4 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.
Only 4 reports for this mode came with an odometer reading, which is too few for percentiles to mean anything. The page is here because someone linked to it; treat the figures as anecdotes, and see the full report for this year instead.
When other fuel system problem gets reported
There are 4 reports of other fuel system problem on the 2011 Nissan Leaf, 4 with a mileage attached. That is too few to place the failure on the odometer with any confidence.
A part like this is normally expected to survive 90,000 miles. It is the 6th most-reported problem on this model year.
The whole distribution
| 10th | 25th | Median | 75th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | 52,650 miles | — | — |
Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.
What a percentile can and cannot tell you here
These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.
What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.
Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.
What happens, and what it costs
Of these reports, 1 a crash and 1 an injury are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.
Putting it right typically runs $300–$2,200 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.
The same failure on other years
The same failure is reported on 6 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2013, at a median of 5,000 miles, and latest on the 2020 at 70,000 miles.
By volume the 2019 carries the most reports, with 18; the 2011 has 4. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.
If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.
The nissan leaf we purchased from abc nissan (phoenix, az) in march, 2011 began experiencing a rapid decrease in range beginning in march, 2012. For 5 months, during multiple phone calls, visits to dealers, and among 2 weeks of testing at the proving grounds, we are being told that the 30% reduction in driving range we have experienced is normal, gradual capacity loss and is not covered by warranty. We believe that there is a defect in the design of the leaf battery causing it to rapidly degrade faster in warmer climates, although owners in california are starting to see range loss as well. We have been given test reports by our dealership that our treatment of the car ?is very good for your battery.? The usability and value of the car has been irrevocably diminished due to this nonconformist, despite the care given to the battery as confirmed by the ev battery usage reports. Owners appear to have no recourse at this time. One owner tried to trade-in his leaf to 11 local car dealers, and 10 refused to make any trade-in offer for a mint-condition car, no capacity loss, no flaws, less than 10,000 miles. We are stuck with a $35,000…
I purchased my 2011 nissan leaf in september of 2012 from stadium nissan in orange, california. I quickly learned that this vehicle was not built for my 69 mile commute(4.9 miles per kwh), but was able to adapt and make it work until a job change in october of 2013. My 10 year old son and I were rear ended shortly after our move to turlock, california. My nissan leaf held up very well to being rear ended at 45mph by a full sized chevy silverado; as I drove it away and the chevy was totaled. My son and I both received concussions from the accident, and unfortunately he is still faced with memory loss. My leaf was taken to alfred matthews collision center for repairs, and sent to central valley nissan to have the batteries removed and reinstalled before and after the body repairs. The repairs took more than 2 months to complete, and my leaf has never been the same. My leaf will no longer get the 69plus freeway miles that I drove before the accident, and will now only get 40-50 city miles per charge (3.8 miles per kwh). I have taken my leaf back to central valley nissan at least 6 times in the last 8 months, and even had one of the…
Also reported on the 2011 Nissan Leaf
Other electrical problem
Other brake problem
Airbag warning light or occupant sensor fault
Other body or interior problem
Software fault or failed update
Other speed control problem
How far this goes
This page is kept out of search results because 4 reports is not enough to publish percentiles from. It stays reachable because somebody looking at this exact car would rather see the reports than be told there are none.
Complaints are voluntary, so 4 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.
Questions this page answers
At what mileage does other fuel system problem happen on the 2011 Nissan Leaf?
Across 4 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 55,000 miles. A quarter were filed before — and a quarter after —. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.
How common is other fuel system problem on the 2011 Nissan Leaf?
4 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.2 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.
What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed