AtWhatMileage
Engine · 18 owner reports

No-start or intermittent start failure on the 2018 Nissan Altima

2 crashes 2 of the 18 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.

Reports of this failure 18
With an odometer reading 16
Reports per 1,000 built 0.1 per 1,000
Filed below 36,000 miles 63%
Mention a crash, fire or injury 2
Typical repair $200–$1,800
What it means when it happens Moderate
Rank among this year's problems 5th

When no-start or intermittent start failure gets reported

Owners of the 2018 Nissan Altima report no-start or intermittent start failure at a median of 35,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 20,000 miles and a quarter after 45,000 miles, from 16 reports that carried an odometer reading.

A part like this is normally expected to survive 88,000 miles. It is the 5th most-reported problem on this model year.

The mileage distribution

The reported range runs from 5,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 55,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 49,500 miles across the middle 80% of reports.

A window that narrow is the signature of a part that fails on its own schedule rather than on how the car is driven — which is usually a design or supplier problem rather than wear and tear.

63% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.

The whole distribution

Percentiles of the 16 odometer readings owners gave.
10th25thMedian 75th90th
6,000 miles 17,680 miles 34,455 miles 47,375 miles 55,500 miles

Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.

What a percentile can and cannot tell you here

These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.

What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.

Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.

What happens, and what it costs

Of these reports, 2 a crash is mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.

Putting it right typically runs $200–$1,800 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.

The same failure on other years

The same failure is reported on 20 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2017, at a median of 5 miles, and latest on the 2006 at 115,000 miles.

By volume the 2009 carries the most reports, with 680; the 2018 has 18. A mode that appears across most years of a model is usually a design choice rather than a bad batch.

If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.

Median
  1. 1996 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 96k
  2. 1997 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  3. 1998 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 78k
  4. 2000 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 84k
  5. 2002 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 73k
  6. 2003 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 89k
  7. 2004 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 71k
  8. 2005 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 86k
  9. 2006 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 115k
  10. 2007 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 36k
  11. 2008 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 70k
  12. 2009 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 76k
  13. 2010 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 50k
  14. 2011 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 35k
  15. 2012 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 74k
  16. 2013 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 63k
  17. 2014 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 80k
  18. 2015 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 33k
  19. 2016 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 34k
  20. 2017 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 5
  21. 2018 (this one) 34k
  22. 2019 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 21k
  23. 2020 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure 38k
  24. 2021 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —
  25. 2022 Nissan Altima no-start or intermittent start failure
    no odometer readings given
    —

Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens

Also reported on the 2018 Nissan Altima

Other brake problem

37 reports median 35k

Other driver assistance problem

23 reports median 46k

Other electrical problem

22 reports median 31k

Cruise control failure

15 reports median 37k

Other body or interior problem

14 reports median 59k

How far this goes

Complaints are voluntary, so 18 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.

Questions this page answers

At what mileage does no-start or intermittent start failure happen on the 2018 Nissan Altima?

Across 16 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 35,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 20,000 miles and a quarter after 45,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.

How common is no-start or intermittent start failure on the 2018 Nissan Altima?

18 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 0.1 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.

What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars

Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed