Other speed control problem on the 2005 Ford Taurus
12 crashes 1 fire 4 injuries 1 death 18 of the 320 reports for this failure mention a crash, a fire, an injury or a death. Those are the owner's words on the complaint form, not a verified finding, and one report can mention more than one.
When other speed control problem gets reported
Owners of the 2005 Ford Taurus report other speed control problem at a median of 94,000 miles. A quarter of the reports come in before 69,000 miles and a quarter after 111,000 miles, from 289 reports that carried an odometer reading.
A part like this is normally expected to survive 78,000 miles. It is the 1st most-reported problem on this model year.
The mileage distribution
The reported range runs from 55,000 miles at the tenth percentile to 141,000 miles at the ninetieth, a spread of 86,200 miles across the middle 80% of reports.
A spread this wide points at use rather than design. Towing, climate, service history and city mileage all move a failure like this, so the median is a weak guide to any individual car.
3% of the dated reports were filed under 36,000 miles.
The whole distribution
| 10th | 25th | Median | 75th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55,000 miles | 69,000 miles | 93,709 miles | 110,900 miles | 141,200 miles |
Read the 10th percentile as “one report in ten arrived this early”. Exact figures are shown in this table because it is the table of record; everywhere else on the site they are rounded to the precision the sample can carry.
What a percentile can and cannot tell you here
These five numbers describe the readings owners gave, in order. The median is the middle one: half the reports arrived below it. The 10th and 90th are the edges of the bulk of the distribution, and the distance between them is the part worth reading. A tight spread — say 70,000 to 95,000 miles — points at something that wears out on a schedule, and the schedule is knowable. A wide one, 20,000 to 190,000, points at a fault that hits some cars and never troubles others, which means the mileage on the listing in front of you tells you very little about your odds.
What these figures are not is a survival curve. Every reading here comes from a car whose owner filed a complaint, so the sample contains only failures: it cannot say what share of the fleet made it past 150,000 miles untouched, because those owners had nothing to report. Nor is the mileage the moment of failure — it is the odometer reading as recalled at the time of filing, which may be weeks later and is sometimes rounded to the nearest ten thousand by the person typing it.
Percentiles are shown at all only once 8 readings exist for the vehicle and mode. Below that the middle of a handful of numbers is noise wearing a decimal point, so the figures are withheld rather than dressed up.
What happens, and what it costs
Of these reports, 12 a crash, 1 a fire, 4 an injury and 1 a fatality are mentioned. Owners write their own complaints and the agency does not verify them, so read this as what the reports say happened rather than as a confirmed count.
Putting it right typically runs $250–$2,000 at an independent US shop. That range is an editorial estimate held in this site's failure-mode catalogue, not a figure from NHTSA, and it is a repair cost rather than a diagnosis cost.
This mode is classified as critical, which means a failure can leave the car unable to stop, steer, or stay out of the way of traffic. It is weighted accordingly in the risk score.
The same failure on other years
The same failure is reported on 20 model years of this car. It shows up earliest on the 2015, at a median of 20,000 miles, and latest on the 2001 at 115,000 miles.
By volume the 2005 is the worst of them, which makes this a problem of this specific year rather than of the model as a whole.
If one year stands out to the left, that is the year to avoid; if the whole line sits at a similar mileage, this is wear rather than a defect in one production run.
Tick median reported mileage Solid middle half of reports Faint 10th to 90th percentile Colour how bad the failure is when it happens
What owners wrote
Verbatim from NHTSA complaint narratives, trimmed for length. The mileage is the one the owner gave.
Tl* - the contact called regarding a rented 2007 ford taurus. The contact had the vehicle for two weeks and the engine surgeed unexpectedly. The failure occurred intermittently. The failure mileage was 11,062. *ak updated 03/19/07. *jb
Tl*- the contact stated that sporadically while driving the 2005 ford taurus with 28,000 failure mileage at any rate of speed, and attempting to come to a stop the vehicle surges forward. The vehicle was taken to a repair shop, but the dealer couldn't find any failures. The current mileage was 35,700.*ak the consumer stated that this is a dangerous defect and would like for to look into a recall for to fix potential defect. Update 4/25/07*tr
I released the gas pedal. The vehicle would not slow down. The engine had to be shut down. The throttle cable was examined and found defective. The dealer replaced cable assembly. The dealer also retained failed assembly. *tr
Also reported on the 2005 Ford Taurus
Cruise control failure
Other engine problem
Other powertrain problem
Complete transmission failure
Torque converter failure
Other body or interior problem
How far this goes
Complaints are voluntary, so 320 is a floor and not a count of affected cars. Mileages are typed in by owners and cluster on round numbers. And the mode itself is assigned by software reading the complaint text, which is reliable in bulk and fallible one report at a time.
Questions this page answers
At what mileage does other speed control problem happen on the 2005 Ford Taurus?
Across 289 owner reports that included an odometer reading, half were filed by 94,000 miles. A quarter were filed before 69,000 miles and a quarter after 111,000 miles. These are the mileages owners reported when they complained, not a prediction for any individual car.
How common is other speed control problem on the 2005 Ford Taurus?
320 reports have been filed with NHTSA, about 168 per 1,000 vehicles. Complaints are voluntary, so this is a floor rather than a count of affected cars.
What this is and is not. These are the mileages at which owners chose to complain to a federal agency, which is not the same as the mileage at which the part fails on every car. It skews toward failures that happened outside warranty, cost real money, or frightened someone. It is still the only public dataset that carries failure mileage at all, and the shape of a few hundred readings is informative even when a single one is not. Methodology · JSON · this failure on other cars
Source Owner complaints and recall records published by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, model years 1996–2027 Figures rebuilt Published by AtWhatMileage How every figure is computed